Sri Lanka Cricket has cautioned the Pakistan Cricket Board about tourism and revenue losses if the India–Pakistan match in Colombo is forfeited.
Pressure has increased on the Pakistan Cricket Board over the uncertainty surrounding the India match at the T20 World Cup. Sri Lanka Cricket has formally contacted the PCB, warning of serious financial consequences if the February 15 fixture in Colombo does not take place.
Pakistan’s government recently confirmed its team will not play India, citing support for Bangladesh after their removal from the tournament over travel concerns.
SLC then outlined the potential damage to tourism and local businesses from a forfeited match. Officials highlighted expected visitor inflow and extended stays linked to the high-profile fixture. Sri Lanka also reminded Pakistan of past cooperation and support during challenging periods. Meanwhile, the ICC has also stepped in and begun discussions with the PCB to seek a resolution.
READ ALSO | Suryakumar Yadav Clarifies Stand on India-Pakistan T20 World Cup Match
“We (SLC) have informed them of the economic impact in case of a forfeiture. We have told them to consider what Sri Lanka stands to lose in case the match doesn’t go ahead. There are a lot of stakeholders who will be directly and indirectly affected if the match doesn’t go ahead,” SLC Secretary Dissanayake told The Indian Express.
Boycott Hits Sri Lanka’s Tourism Plans
Sri Lanka Cricket expected significant revenue from the India–Pakistan match. Hotel tariffs in Colombo rose from USD 45 to USD 60. Following Pakistan’s boycott announcement, reports now indicate multiple hotel booking cancellations, raising concerns over reduced tourism income.
“We have reminded them about how we have supported them in the past as well. From the demand for tickets, it was evident that we were going to receive a huge boost economically, as people who turn up for the fixture will definitely spend a few more days exploring the country. So it is a huge loss for everyone. It is a grim picture,” he concluded.
This article follows WicketWatcher’s editorial standards. Learn more in our Editorial Policy or report an issue via our Corrections Policy.