Jason Holder’s contentious catch to dismiss Rajat Patidar sparked a major debate with experts giving the final decision on the catch.
A major controversy unfolded during the IPL 2026 clash between Gujarat Titans and Royal Challengers Bengaluru in Ahmedabad, when Jason Holder pulled off a stunning catch to dismiss Rajat Patidar. However, questions were quickly raised over whether the catch was clean.
Holder sprinted across from the deep and completed a sliding effort, appearing to secure the ball. But replays hinted that the ball may have brushed the ground as he got back up, leading to immediate protests from the RCB camp. Virat Kohli led the charge, visibly unhappy with the on-field decision.
ALSO READ | WATCH | 4,6,4,4 Sanju Samson Bashes Hardik Pandya Brutally Inside Powerplay During MI vs CSK Clash
RCB Voices Concern, Umpire Stands Firm
Following the game, RCB pacer Bhuvneshwar Kumar addressed the controversy and admitted that the team had doubts about the decision.
“We saw that the ball touched the ground, but I don’t know what the umpire told [the players], so it’s something within the law or whatever. I have no idea about that but, yeah, we wanted to have the umpire to have a closer look at that,” Bhuvneshwar Kumar said at the press conference after the game.
The decision, however, remained unchanged after TV umpire Abhijit Bhattacharya reviewed the footage and ruled that Holder had sufficient control of the ball. Patidar was given out, leaving RCB at 79/3 in the eighth over. They eventually posted 155, which GT chased down comfortably with 25 balls remaining.
Experts Give Final Verdict On Dismissal
The incident triggered widespread debate among experts, with former cricketers offering differing views on the ruling.
“My debate on it would be: Jason Holder, first he caught the ball, no problems with that. And then with the sliding of the hand initially, that deserved a second look. And then you talk about control of the ball but also control of the body. So when you’re looking to get yourself up having slid along the ground, are they determining that his fingers was under the ball?” Ian Bishop said.
“Because the back of the hand was to the sky, which means the ball was facing the grass. And so there was to me doubt there about ball and ground, because you’re not in control of your body until you stop sliding and you stand up if you’re going to do that. So out or not out? “I think there was sufficient evidence in my mind for that to be [not out],” Bishop said.
Abhinav Mukund also echoed similar concerns, questioning the clarity of the law.
“I know the law is there’s a lot of ambiguity in the law itself. But if the ball touches the ground, to me it’s not out. And what I saw, which I’m sure the TV umpire did see and a lot of our viewers also saw, [was that] the ball touched the ground” he said.
MCC Law and the Final Verdict
As per the laws set by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), a catch is considered fair only if the fielder has complete control over both the ball and their movement before the ball touches the ground.
While the third umpire ruled in favour of Holder, the incident has once again highlighted the grey areas in the interpretation of catching laws in modern cricket. The debate continues to divide opinions, with fans and experts still questioning whether the dismissal should have stood.
This article follows WicketWatcher’s editorial standards. Learn more in our Editorial Policy or report an issue via our Corrections Policy.